Creative Project, explanation.

• What genre is your production? How will you reflect this genre?
• What stylistic elements will you focus on (mise-en-scene, sound, camera, editing), and how will your production make this clear?

My chosen genre for my short film, is an avant garde (experimental) film. The way in which this will reflect within my movie will be completely dependent on my shots and editing.

The main aspects which I will be focussing on throughout the creation of my short film will be editing and camera. This being because, I have seen a variety of art films which have particular conventions which I plan to implement throughout. The two main conventions which I plan to use are text, the usage of perspective shots and this concept of everything that is shown within the film not only has a deeper meaning but they are all connected. In terms of how I will do this is by using a "moving image, to still image" the way in which I will do this is by using my last shot (which will be a close up shot of my female) taking a screen shot and printing it and placing it within a photo frame which I would then place within my final shot and throughout the film allowing the whole film to have closure as well as a connection due to my film being based around a poem the imagery will also be connected to the words spoken.

• What is your rationale for choosing a short film or an extract?

The reasoning behind me choosing a short film, is because my movie is of the genre 'avant garde' meaning it has a beginning middle and end not only this but because I created the poem myself in which my film will base around.

• Who is your SPECIFIC target audience, according to age, gender, fans of the genre, etc?

My main target audience, are for late teens and over. This because, it is something that I believe is for those who have been through what my poem bases around. Confusion, and feeling but on a level which leaves them as an individual strained questioning who they are and their perspective. Due to this, I feel as though it is perfect to aim my film towards late teens due to this being the time whereby we are pushed to find ourselves. To find who we are, what we want in life and with so many things happening around us it's sometimes difficult to keep an optimistic view point. In terms of gender, it can appeal to anyone both male and female I don't have a set target audience in terms of gender as being a teenager applies to both sexes. Again, as it is based around the whole "emotional roller-coaster" of being a teenager it could well be that fans of the 'experimental' films may also like mine but as stated before my target audience is quite broad.

• Who or what is your influence in this production? (You need to select a 2 minute extract from a film, that reflects the 'style' you are aiming for)

In terms of influence it came from a variety of places mostly other art movies such as L'Etoile de Mer / The Sea Star; Director - Man Ray, Un Chien Andalou/ An Andalusian Dog; Director -  Luis Buñuel / Salvador Dali who are both known for their experimental take within the late 1920's as this is all fair and square they both have different aspects within their films which inspired me. From L'Etoile de Mer, the usage of text to explain the plot of the story and the 'blurry' outlook to give you as a member of the audience as if you were there with them.

In terms of Un Chien Andalou, they have a variety of 'Brave imagery' you could say that they weren't afraid to use “No idea or image that might lend itself to a rational explanation of any kind would be accepted.” - Dali and Bunuel's on 'Un Chien Andalou'

I have these classic influences yet I also have a modern influence who is not your average director because he is in fact a youtuber. This meaning that he uploads videos on a regular basis and in this case, his short films have inspired me a vast amount. KickThePj, this being because the way in which he uses 'editing' and location really mix well together to give you an illusion of this somewhat 'paradise/ imaginary' state which is a common within his short films however not only because of this but because he is also somehow able to have a 'comical' feel to his movies yet they are serious and have a deeper meaning to them.

• Where will you shoot the production (actual, specific locations, including in college and outside college)

In terms of shooting, and where there are a variety of places whereby I could shoot but so far it's hopefully the top deck of the 60 bus which is outside the college. I will also be shooting within my house, for the shots which consist of a 'bed, dining room etc'

• Who will be your performers?

In terms of performers, my main character will be a female named 'Leah' other characters will be played by fellow peers and class mates.

1:34 - 1:56

6:27 - 7:26

KickThePj - Office Space

KickThePj - Tiny Planet

What are the similarities between Fish Tank and the beginning of 'Sket'?

The similarities between Fish Tank and the beginning of Sket are quite similar in terms of the crimes that have been committed and the conventions of the two main characters. Mia and Kayla; Mia who is 15 years whereas Kayla is 16. Only a year gap, however in terms of the roles which are portrayed by both actresses are two young females who are socially isolated. In terms of the crimes which are committed in both films completely differ, this being because 'fish tank' is basically a build of subtle crimes E.g. Under aged drinking, smoking, breaking an entry and their biggest 'offence' would be the sexual intercourse which takes place between Mia and her mothers boyfriend. In comparison to the crimes which take place within 'Sket' there is no comparison. This being because, the crimes which are committed within 'Sket' are ones whereby others have been/ are killed, harmed and potentially puts the main characters in danger.

In terms of the two main characters, there are similarities in terms of how they both cope with the struggles that they're going through. The abuse of alcohol, and drugs is a first whereby they are at constant reach of it. Another way in which they both relate is that they both confide in music the constant listening to the songs in a way allow both of their characters to be calmed and soothed. The way in which music is used/ perceived within 'Fish tank' is that it's the escape which 'Mia' uses to get away; and within that she finds another source: Dance. Although, Mia is not amazing at the act she still uses this source to completely transfer her mindset to another place and get away from reality. In terms of Kayla the way in which she uses the comfort of music is not only as a comfort but also as a shield. The music it self, allows her to focus on nothing but her aim yet at the same time; in the back of her mind she is able to connect with it on a deeper connection. An example of this being shown, is in the first scene where we are introduced to Kayla walking within the estate (which is another similarity with both films whereby it is both based within rural areas of London as well as within estates/ flats) with a tracking shot. Showing the audience not only her but her surroundings. The way in which the music is used within this scene is by editing the music which is blasting through her headphones to block out the noises surrounding her; so that when she walks past a group of teenage'd boys she not only doesn't hear what they have to say but completely ignores their actions. Another way whereby both the films relate are that they both have females as their main characters. The females are portrayed as 'heroines' which is another attribute to both films which I personally find appealing.

The way in which females are portrayed within 'Fish Tank' are that they are shown as innocent and weak but the main female character in the film has these attributes but she never allows these particular types of emotions to throw her off... In a way Mia a representation of all females who refuse to show their weakness for example, when finally bonding with her Mother's boyfriend and caught dancing she completely flips when confronted about what it is that she's doing because she is finally portrayed not only within the film as being open/ happy but she is shown as enjoying herself to not only the audience but her 'family members, but when this is completely stripped of her and she acts out it is made clear that this is not something that she nor her family are used too... Happiness. In terms of the movie 'Sket' the way in which females are portrayed are not only as 'sex objects' but strong independent individuals who are capable of taking care of themselves without the help of any male; not only this but again like Mia they are shown to keep their emotional side at bay.

Thursday 10th October 2013 - Period 1

Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 "You imprinted on my Daughter"

In this particular scene, we are shown the introduction of Bella to her first born 'Renesmee' the first scene shown is a tracking shot of both Edward and Bella walking towards the 'living room' which is then switched to a P.O.V shot whereby we see the comments made by her new 'family' comments made by Alice, Carlisle and Esme. Though this shot is a medium long shot we are still able to see the happiness in each characters face which is also reinforced through the tone of their voice. The shot used to show Bella her reaction to Renesmee is a close up. Enforcing Bella's look of amazement, to show the audience that she is in absolute awe of her. This is also, the first scene whereby the audience is introduced to her child 'Renesmee' the way in which this child is portrayed is through another close up this being because she is constantly held by another person. When held in Bella's arms we are shown a high angle to see that she is indeed holding her child and then a low angle to enforce her look of awe towards her. The scene whereby, we are shown Renesmee's powers reinforces how much emotion she has as a young child; through this we are shown a throwback to Renesmee's first look at her mother 'Bella' in this shot we are shown an extreme close up of Bella's eyes, and face stating the word 'beautiful'

The scene is quickly changed to a conversation which takes place with Bella and Jacob within this scene we are shown two contrasting emotions. Jacob is constantly shown as weak and scared, this is also shown through the tone of his voice and how at the constant use of 'Oh' it breaks. The shot used to show the emotions of both Bella and Jacob is the repetitive use of 'shot versed shot' In terms of angles, it's different from any other film due to Bella being quite short whereas Jacob is tall. Therefore when using a 'shot reversed shot' Bella is indeed the one who is angry however usually when a low angle is used it is to imply that the character is weak and small whereas in this scene it is used to show that Bella is in control and is in absolute out rage of Jacob. The shot used to enforce this is a close up which shows both of the emotions on each characters face, Bella in complete anger whereas Jacob in fear as to what is going to happen. The scene where Bella attacks Jacob uses quite a range of 'cutaways' this being because she punches Jacob in the stomach twice which is then shown to enforce how strong she really is. Another close up of Bella is shown when she hears the nickname that Jacob created for her daughter; the usage of this shot really captures the anger which she holds towards him.

Finding Nemo - Dory Speaking Whale

In this scene I will be analysing is the scene from 'Finding Nemo' where Dory speaks whale. In this scene we are shown two fishes; Marlin and Dory. Who are roaming the ocean, in search of 'Sydney' where Marlin's son 'Nemo' has been taken. In this scene we are shown a variety of emotion. We are first shown a low angle of both the characters and through this the emotion which is on both of their faces is the look of 'surprise' we are also shown a type of 'fuzziness' which is above them both. Another shot which is shown within this scene is a 'shot reversed shot' between Marlin and Dory showing the exasperation on Marlin's face towards Dory's actions which is her optimistic view on life. In terms of Marlin we can see that he is tired and agitated. An over the shoulder shot has been used to reinforce this which but once shown Dory's reaction it is as if we are shown Marlin's P.O.V as it shows what exactly he looks at when speaking to Dory which is her cut. Before this scene we are also shown a P.O.V shot from Dory whereby she is searching for someone to ask for directions. When speaking to the 'whale' Dory has no idea who or what it is however Marlin is the first to realise this, this is shown again through his facial expression but also with the usage of a slow zoom to Marlin's face.

How does 'In Bruges' use mise-en-scene to reflect and develop the characters of Ray, Ken and Harry? How do the performance styles of Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson and Ralph Fiennes also reflect and develop the characters?

"Fuck man, maybe that's what hell is. The entire rest of eternity spent in fucking Bruges."

In Bruges was created in 2008, based within the actual country Bruges is based around two assassins and one main who owns both Ray and Ken... Well has hired them to do his dirty work for him although he is highly capable of doing so himself. In this essay I will be reflecting how mise-en-scene has been used to develop the characters Ray, Ken and Harry.

We begin the film with a voice-over of the character Ray played by Colin Farrell, from this particular voice-over we can already determine some characteristics of Ray; for example we can hear that he is Irish. Ray as a character by his introduction is quite a non-chalet man as he describes how he committed a murder with no sense of remorse or regret. "After I killed him I dropped the gun in the Thames washed the residue off my hands in the bathroom of a burger king" This particular statement implying that the murder that he has just committed meant nothing to him. When we are first shown Ray we are shown a young man with quite a shabby look to him which is enforced through both his clothing, facial hair and hair.  Ray's hair is short and scruffy, as are his eyebrows which I think gives his character more of a uniqueness to it. Not only does it emphasise Ray's 'Shabbiness' but the idea of Ray being this sour young man. As is shown by how he uses his clothing to emphasise his boredom this is done by him pulling up the collar of his jacket and wrapping himself as to look quite anti-social. 

Ray in this particular scene is shown sat on a canoe across Ken, as Ken looks as if he is about to explode with happiness with his surroundings where on the other-hand Ray looks completely out of place and again emphasising on the fact that he is indeed 'Anti-social' as he is sat opposite of Ken with the look of disgust upon him. In the beginning of the film we see Ray and Ken walk out from the train station with two contrasting emotions; Ray is completely distressed and unamused whereas Ken has a look of happiness and adoration upon his face. In terms of Ray's surroundings we can see that it isn't where he nor anyone else would place him just because of his character and how Colin Farrell has portrayed him. Ray as a character as stated before comes across as quite a bitter young man, the way in which this is portrayed by Collin is through his usage of body language... So to speak the way that Ray slouches and in-particular the scene whereby Ray agrees to do anything Ken wants. Within the scene Ray drags his feet to emphasise how bored he is and in a way to imply that he is quite childish. As stated by Ken "Like some five year old who's dropped all his sweets" In this scene, Ray attempts to find interest with what Ken is saying/ his surroundings but is unable to do so because he honestly holds no interest whatsoever... A scene which completely contrasts from what he have already learnt from Ray's character is one where he visits an art gallery in Bruges. In this scene we see; Ray looking over a number of paintings some with a look of disgust and others with utter complete shock and again boredom until he finds one "I quite like this one, all the rest are rubbish spastics but this one's quite good" The reason in which this particular scene shows a different side of Ray and contrasts from the character we have known to accept is the basic fact whereby Ray makes a comment on the work and goes on to ask Ken what the picture actually means. In terms of Ray's character, this wouldn't be considered as a stereotyped action for him to do though through this we the audience begins to think that maybe... Just maybe Ray has finally found his "place" within Burges. 

Harry's character is unknown to the audience as to what he looks like/ who he's played by and who as a whole he is... We are aware that there is a constant "he" as said by Ken and Ray "He's not going to ring tonight" the first mention we have of Harry is the first time that Ray and Ken visit a pub in Bruges where they have a conversation started by Ray and his hatred for the country. We can already tell by the way that Ray and Ken speak of this 'he' character that he is in charge therefore once Ray states "Harry, thank you for the trip to Bruges, it's been very nice, but we're coming back to London now and hide out in a proper country where it isn't all just fucking chocolate" After Ray has finished his sentence we are now aware as to who this mysterious 'he' is. Within the same conversation, Ken states "Harry can get guns anywhere" this gives Harry's character more of an dangerous appeal. The first time that we see Harry is the scene where Ken sends Ray off in the hopes that he would not be found by Harry as he himself has no-idea where he is going... Ken informs Harry through the phone after hanging up we are shown Harry's reaction. Harry who is played by Ralph Fiennes has a cockney accent and is British this distinctive difference is made clear to us due to Ray and Ken both being Irish which is also shown through their accents and also implied through their cultural upbringing in terms of how openly they discuss race. The first scene we have where we see Harry is of him looking at the phone in absolute anger and then smashing the phone against his desk. If the statement said by Ken before does not suggest to us that Harry is a abusive/ violent as a character then the note written to Ken and Ray from Harry would beg to differ.

"Number One, why aren't you in when I fucking told you to be in? Number Two, why doesn't this hotel have phones with fucking voicemail and not have to leave messages with the fucking receptionist? Number Three, you better fucking be in tomorrow night when I fucking call again or there'll be fucking hell to pay. I'm fucking telling you - Harry."

This note that Harry leaves implies that he as a character is quite aggressive and swears quite a lot. When we are first introduced to Harry we are shown him in a dress top and suit pants from this first glance we can already see that Harry is all business. In terms of Harry's surroundings we can again see that he is surrounded by quite a formal and wealthy looking office. At first glance as it is a close up of Harry and a phone all we see is Harry's disgust/ anger towards Ken yet aimed towards the phone in the background we see double windows with mahogany coloured curtains which could be a symbol of Harry's blood thirst as Harry is also clutching to the phone. We are then zoomed out to see Harry smash the phone against the table top which then again reinforces the 'violent' personality that we as the audience have given to him... What makes it worse is the dialogue said afterwards with his Wife; Natalie. "Natalie: Harry! Harry: [stops] What? Natalie: It's an inanimate fucking object! Harry: You're an inanimate fucking object" Afterwards we are shown a scene of Harry with his kids which is a complete contrast from everything we thought of Harry. We considered him to be this cold hearted killer when in fact he is married with kids, when speaking to his children he has more of a soft voice because of this we begin to re-judge Harry and hope that there is some good in him. The body language completely changes when Harry portrays two different emotions when angry he is more stern whereas when he is speaking to his children is more calm and content and at the same time teaching his kids how important 'honour' and sticking to your word means to him. Harry also apologises to his wife for calling her an inanimate object. Which again emphasises on this 'soft' character side of Harry. In terms of the first assumption we have of Harry's character it is then again reinforced to us that Harry still has that hard side to him. This being because once he lands in Bruges he has a certain air to him whereby he not only looks self assured but it is shown by his walk and how confident he actually is, that nothing can harm him.

Ken, as a character within Bruges is your stereotypical tourist. Within the country Ken looks as if, he wouldn't want to be anywhere else because of this we already know that there is a huge contrast between both Ken and Ray: this is again shown through the dialogue that takes place between both Ken and Ray "Ray: Do you think this is good? Ken: Do I think what's good? Ray: You know, going around in a boat, looking at stuff? Ken: Yes, I do. It's called sight-seeing." Ken's character is one of which is bubbly and is shown as an constant optimist this is because of Ken's genuine perspective on life and where he and Ray are. When we first see Ken we are shown quite a large male with ginger hair, your typical irish with ginger locks and a bubbly personality topped with the strong accent allows us to assume that Ken is nothing like Ray or Harry... Throughout the film we are shown different aspects of Ken most of the time he is able to bear Ray's attitude towards the country until they visit the "Basilica of the Holy Blood" whereby we are shown Kens true personality where he expresses his passion for history and all it's glory. Whilst visiting the 'Basilica of the Holy Blood' Ken explains to Ray what it is he is about to do then asks if he would like to join him as shown in the dialogue below:

Ken: Up there, the top altar, is a vial brought back by a Flemish knight from the Crusades in the Holy Land. And that vial, do you know what it's said to contain?
Ray: No, what's it said to contain?
Ken: It's said to contain some drops of Jesus Christ's blood. Yeah, that's how this church got its name. Basilica of the Holy Blood.
Ray: Yeah. Yeah.
Ken: And this blood, right, though it's dried blood, at different times over many years, they say it turned back into liquid. Turned back into liquid from dried blood. At various times of great stress.
Ray: Yeah?
Ken: Yeah. So, yeah, I'm gonna go up in the queue and touch it, which is what you do.
Ray: Yeah?
Ken: Yeah. You coming?
Ray: Do I have to?
Ken: Do you have to? Of course you don't have to. It's Jesus' fucking blood, isn't it? Of course you don't fucking have to! Of *course* you don't fucking have to!

This particular conversation shows just how much Ken actually knows and how intelligent he is as a character but at the same time it shows his disbelief towards Ray and his absolute zero interest in culture. When Ken is placed within sectors of culture and buildings he is absolutely lost for words and stares in absolute awe which reflects his character in terms of how intelligent Ken is and how he is an appreciator of the finer things in life. Throughout the film Ken is shown as the father like figure towards Ray constantly making sure he is okay, and does not get into trouble all because he was informed by Harry to do so. In terms of how strictly Ken follows Harry's orders it implies that not only is Ken intelligent but loyal too. In terms of Kens clothing it is similar to Ray whereby he also has a trench coat but rather than jeans and a top he is constantly dressed in a suit... Which could also insinuate that Ken is always ready for death to approach him. This is proven within the film of Ken's actual death, whereby before going to meet up with Harry he dresses himself in a black suit as if Harry himself is death. When it is indeed Ken's time to die he does not fight he simply accepts his fate and informs Harry of his respect that he has for him;

"Harry. I am totally in your debt. The things that's gone between us in the past, I love you unreservedly for all that. For your integrity, for your honour. I love you. The boy had to be let go. The boy had to be given a chance. And if to do that I had to say fuck you and fuck what I owe you and fuck everything that's gone on between us then that's what I had to do. But I ain't fighting you. And I accept totally everything you've got to do. I accept it totally." 

This particular statement which Ken says before being shot in the leg proves that even on his last breathe he will spend it saving someone else proving that not only is Ken an intelligent and loyal character but also giving us that hint of love and compassion.

In conclusion in terms of mise-en-scene being used to reflect and develop the characters of Ray, Ken and Harry it has been used well in a sense that all characteristics used for each character is apart of the characters personality. In terms of the actors chosen to portray all three character, I personally think it was a brilliant choice this being because they all ranged in terms of age, height and weight but all were indeed men and shared this plus a passion for killing although each character has their own belief behind why they kill they still share that same blood thirst.

Analysing Acting and Performance

The scene that I will be analysing in terms of acting and performance is the 2006, film 300. The introduction to the actual film and the main character that I will be focusing on is King Leonidas. King Leonidas is played by Gerard Butler who for this role before becoming 'King' he stated he wanted to look "really strong" for his role. Therefore he trained with a high-intensity workout for four months prior to the film's shooting. As shown below on the right hand side is a picture of Gerard before he began working for 300, and on the left is his accomplishment. Gerard, not only worked on his physique but his facial hair too, he grew out his beard and hair for the role so that he had that masculine influence as well as his physique. 

The whole concept of King Leonidas, is that he is portrayed as a cold man. Due to this portrayal this rough and hard look to him which is not only shown through his speech and accent but through the shabbiness of his facial hair. I think it really gives the character his authenticity; because he is a king and a king deserves a beard. King Leonidas, is a character based upon the real-life king of Sparta who led a small army, commonly known as the 300 Spartans, against the overwhelming numbers of the Persian Empire. As stated before, Gerard wanted to get in shape for this particular role, this being because when you think of King Leonidas you think strong and empowered. Due to this, the look in which Gerard aimed for to portray Leonidas went perfectly. Alongside with the look of becoming Lenoidas, Gerard had to become the character, as this film is based upon war and action he had to do his own stunts which he had not done before.

"My stunt guy said because they did 'The Matrix' and 'Bourne Identity,' and I really clung onto this fact because they said nobody in any of those films had to do a piece this long, uncut, with this many moves. So that took a lot of training and I almost didn't do it."

 - Gerard Butler on doing stunts within 300

In terms of the acting done by Gerard playing the character 'King Leonidas', he is built up within the introduction to be this cold headed and strong minded man as we are shown his upbringing/ childhood in the first five minutes.We are then shown King Leonidas, as a man with his own child rein-acting the scene whereby he was taught to fight by his own father to his own. Within this scene, we are shown Gerard as a teacher and a father therefore his acting within this scene is seen as passionate yet assured; he has implemented both within his role, by mentioning his father but at the same time being harsh with his own son emphasising the importance of "fear and strength" The acting style that was portrayed throughout this scene is that he has quite the questionable look upon his face, which for this scene is suited. 300, is fantasy, action adventure film therefore for this movie there is an expectation of the actor being able to act a certain way as the film is an adaptation of a well known Comic Series the whole movie had a very high expectation as it was completely different from what was being released back then however the inparticular actors who been chosen  have an even higher expectation from the fans as initially they will be portraying a character that many readers look up too. 

300, was Gerard's breakout movie because soon after he was featured in films such as 'P.S I love you' 'Olympus has fallen' etc. You wouldn't expect, that after playing such a profound character like King Leonidas and an action/ adventure film straight to a Romantic Drama. I guess, you could say that Gerard has range as he was again impeccable in P.S I love you. In terms of the relationship that Gerard had within the film the most iconic one would be the strong bond he has with his wife. This being, because at the end of the scene King Leonidas kicks a 'Persian messenger' into well due to his lack of respect to his people and most importantly his Queen. Just before, kicking over the messenger Leonidas shares a very intimate look with his wife as if to ask for her permission to do so. By this small look that they both give each other it gave the scene that little bit more authenticity... Made it more personal than it seemed. Due to this scene, it allowed the audience to see another side of Leonidas opening him up more to the actual audience rather than just assuming he is this heartless character who cares for nothing but blood shed.

Throughout this scene, obviously Gerard was unable to portray all different life stages of King Leonidas but the life stage that he does portray is more significant to the whole film as it shows the man that he has become. The character which Gerard plays, is a conclusion of an upbringing of violence, independence, loyalty and strength. Which within this whole scene has been portrayed very well due to Gerard's acting implying throughout everything he has been taught within his life. As an example, just before he decides how he is going to reply to the Persian messenger there is another rein-enactment of Leonidas childhood. Whereby he is faced with his "initiation" which determined whether he came back to his homeland as a Spartan... Or not at all. The scene which he gains "a heightened sense of things" and there is a close up of Leonidas's feet... Which is then again shown in his adult life but shown with again starting with a close up with Gerard's feet, face, an extreme close up of his eyes and an establishing to emphasise the wind. 

In conclusion the way in which Gerard suited his voice within this scene was by keeping calm but adding quite a rough edge to his voice when speaking to certain characters; when speaking to his wife he is still on edge but through his facial expression you can see he is quite soft. Whereas when speaking to the Persian messenger, he is sarcastic and ruthless. The introduction of this film is the base to the whole story line of the film, it is the most iconic scene throughout film history due to the one sentence that Gerard executed so perfectly "Madness? This is Sparta!" the way in which this scene ends is by Leonidas walking away in an nonchalant form whereby it again emphasises King Leonidas's whole concept of a stone cold killer. It also shows the multi-task capability of Gerard as he was able to rage to the Persian messenger yet at the same time kick him into oblivion. 

Street Dance - Personality

Street dance is a British film that was created in 2010 based around the dance genres of both street and Ballet. The film bases around a British dance crew who have been left by their lead dancer so that he can focus on his studies just five weeks before their biggest competition. As it is a combination of Ballet and Street they must combine and do whatever it is they can do to win (The film can be viewed in either 2D or 3D) I will be choosing two particular scenes which uses location, setting, props. costume, make-up and hair to signify personality.

The first scene that I will be analysing, is the opening credits whereby we are introduced to each character in different locations which gives a hint of their actual personality. For example, when being introduced to a character named "Jay" we are shown him laid back on his bed with a female approaching him and with trainers in the background due to Jay being on a bed we can see that the setting of this scene is within a bedroom. The implication of Jay laying down could inform us that he is quite a laid back person, which is shown in the next scene where he leaves his dance 'crew' as if it was nothing. We are then shown the female who lays on top of him, this could also tell us that he has the type of personality in which leads him to be an attractor of females. The clothing of Jay is very minimal with only trouser on and his bare chest, which again could prove the "womaniser" stereotype that has been created for him; same with his hair. Nothing special has been done nor with make-up it's your everyday morning look "just rolled out of bed" Another character, who is introduced to us through the opening credits would be Boogie. Boogie, is introduced to the audience by working in a music shop as a DJ. Our first thought of Boogie is that he is a Dj and nothing else, and that his passion is music. We are then shown, a glimpse into what he is actually like by his sudden realisation of the time. The way that this is done by is through Boogie looking at his wrist which holds a watch. Thus showing us, that Boogie is the type of person who is usually late and is constantly on the run. The clothing of Boogie is casual, with just jeans and a t-shirt. What's really distinctive of Boogie would be the fact that he has headphones on, but then on his t-shirt are headphones again. This could imply, that what we initially assumed about Boogie having a passion for music could be true. The setting of Boogie's work place, looks cluttered and busy therefore showing that he is used to a big audience thus expressing that his character is one who is not shy and very open.

The next scene that I will be analysing is the duet dance that took place with Carly and Thomas. Both characters are significantly different, but within this scene they somehow mix both of their personalities to create one. A big reason behind their differences would be the fact that Carly is a street dancer whereas Tomas originated in ballet. The clothing of the two characters are quite similar, the only difference being that Tomas has a black tank on whereas Carly has a red one on giving them both the 'casual' look whilst they dance. In terms of showing their personality, the dancing genre that they each have is a significant build up of who they are as characters; especially their clothing. With Carly we can see that she has a tank top on and her bra is visible by her sides with loose jeans on which express that she is open and quite easy going. On the other hand we have Tomas who is also in loose jeans but with a tight fitted tank top on; which could express that his personality bases around control and serenity. The location in which the routine takes place, is at Tomas's roof. Which is something else, that expresses the characters personality as you would expect an individual who studies Ballet at an prestigious school within London to live in an expensive house or flat actually lives in an studio flat similar to Carly. This showing that both individuals have more in common than you would firstly believe.

In conclusion, within the film 'personality' has been shown throughout quite thoroughly and deeply. Each prop or costume used has a more profound meaning to the actual characters that meets the eye. The film has done a good job, in terms of showing this through a variety of objects and places in which it has been shot too as well as the clothing.

Analysis of Props'

The clip that I have decided to analyse for usage of props is "Harry Potter and The Philosophers Stone" the reason behind me choosing this film/ clip is because the usage of props within the saga of Harry Potter are always distinct and the purpose is clear; for example the usage of wizards/ witches 'wands'. The prop that I will be analysing from the scene is the 'Sorting Hat' the sorting hat is basically "a sentient Hogwarts artefact which magically determines to which of the four school Houses each new student is to be assigned." The sorting hat is not only a prop but also a type character within the film/ book.

The way in which the hat is framed is that we are introduced to the hat by it being placed upon a wooden stool whereby the characters will be sat on so that their fate is determined. The framing of the hat is that it's shown from behind, so that we can actually see the new students walking towards the hat. As you can see below; we are shown the hat limp and lifeless and the surroundings of the hat full of life and light. The way in which the hat is portrayed/ communicates is through a line that looks like stitching across the middle of the hat.

The characters which are used within the scene are the four main 'Harry Potter, Hermoine Granger, Ron Weasley and Draco Malfoy' the reason that they are used is that so the audience are able to view what houses their favourite characters have been put in, however not only this but we are shown the response/ reaction of each character... "Ah, another Weasley. Well, I know just what to do with you. GRYFFINDOR!" This being the categorisation that the sorting hat put one of the main characters 'Ron Weasley' in from this we are shown the reaction of Ron. Ron's family have all been students at Hogwarts, who have all been placed within the house of 'Gryffindor' therefore the whole acting of Ron breathing a sigh of relief compliments his character as it shows that being put into 'Gryffindor' was where he was hoping to be put in the first place.

In conclusion, the clip itself shows the usage of the prop and how it has been influenced throughout the scene. In terms of the scene that I have analysed, the manipulation and framing of the actual prop allows the audience to see that it is a significant part of the scene/ movie. Also, if this doesn't shine through to the actual viewer that it is in fact important then the introduction given to the new students about what it is/ what it does then I don't know what will.

Sound of Cinema: The Music that Made the Movies

I recently watched the documentary "Sound of Cinema: The Music that Made the Movies" which aired on BBC Four, Thursday evening. The documentary itself I found to be not only helpful but very enjoyable. I never usually watch shows like this, however with this show I thoroughly enjoyed it.

It not only reinforced the whole importance of 'music' within film for me but also, with given examples showed how much of a difference it makes if nothing was used. For example the John Barry who created the title music for the 'The Ipcress File' has been tagged as the composer who by creating music, "created another character." From hearing that statement you don't fully understand what it is that Neil Brand is talking about until he shows us a clip of his work. That is when it hits you, and the realization of not only how important music is for a movie but how well John Barry was at his job. It was a small conclusion for the beginning of the film, of what it is that we should expect out of it.

Another example of an early movie composer would be 'Bernett Herman' especially for his work for the silent movie 'Citizen Kane' as he begins the film with three chords which he repeats throughout the film with different accompaniments along with it; yet at the end he concludes it with a lovely melody of what the character feels... Which is contentment. As he has died. Herman, made a statement in such few notes; he was indeed a man of few words... Or should I say keys.

Most popular melodies of the 19th century were known as 'Light motifs' which are basically short memorable musical ideas. Which allows the composer to leave a impression upon the audience. For example the motif for 'King Kong - 1938' was one of the most iconic movies of it's time due to it stretching the concept of visual play and yet using music throughout the movie. It was "the film that proved. where music truly belongs, at the heart of the drama"

In conclusion, I have learnt that film without music would be completely dull and a waste of my time; this being because when I watch a film straight after I instantly look to the soundtrack depending on whether I enjoyed the film or not. Music/ sound for film is that one thing that allows the audience to feel more connected to the film itself as well as the characters.

Tuesday 18th - Mise En Scene

Mise en scene, can be defined as the arrangement and the design of the scenery to fit with the scene that is taking place. The different elements of mise en scene that can be analysed are costume, composition, makeup/ hair, acting etc. I have watched a 5 minute scene from the movie 'Snow white and the huntsman' within this scene I have analysed the mise en scene used within it.

Mise en scene that I saw most appropriate to speak about first are the costumes. The costumes that were chosen for each person fits perfectly with the era that they attempted to portray. The clothing for the queen is elegant and you can see from her clothing that she is powerful and rich; as her hair is elegant it only makes sense that her hair is too. Whereas in comparison to the prisoner she has 'snow white' she is clothed in rags and has greasy hair and a dirty face; in terms of the costume it defiantly shows a huge contrast and has been used well.

The area in which they filmed was again perfect, as they again had a contrast of the areas. The greenery showing happiness and peace, and the place in which the queen lives and her people 'depression and horror' this is also portrayed by the lighting used. The places in which they filmed not only varied but also expressed the characters personality. This being said a perfect example of this would be the Queen; who's castle is grey and surrounded by soldiers (who are dressed in black) Showing that she is superficial, and is aware that she is hated yet is ready to face anyone who comes in her way.

In conclusion, from the scene that I have just analysed the way in which they use mise en scene allows the audience to believe that the locations are in fact real when in fact most scenes have been CGI'd.

The Scene that I watched:

Creating a very short film ft Gabrielle

Today in class we were given a task in which we had to create a short... Well a very short film. We were only given thirty minutes, in which we had to film all five shots. Within these shots we learnt quite a few things; technical mostly but also time keeping too. Our film is called 'Jurassic Coulsdon' therefore our story was based around dinosaurs taking over the world due to a mistake of one innocent individual who brought what she thought was fake but an actual 'dinosaur egg' only to have the childs mother come after it.

This is the first scene - Bathroom scene 

Within this scene we learnt that the bathroom isn't the most appropriate location when filming due to the echo and the space. It wasn't loud enough and lead to the problem of not being able to hear what they were saying correctly.

The second scene - The Egg Scene

From this scene we learnt that again there was an issue with the sound and the 'door' scene where it would continuously bang against the frame. So mostly what went wrong was with the sound.

The Third Scene - Running Scene

This scene was pretty basic to do, as all we needed to film was the running. However it didn't look as realistic as the others due to the passer by's who didn't look frightened but just wondering what was going on.

The Fourth Scene - The Cliffhanger 

This scene was also pretty easy to film as it was the cliffhanger and the ending to our film where our idea was the leave the audience wanting more. Also, the ending was to show the two girls in a state of panic and fear.

The film was basically quite comical, where it was yes serious but at the same time it allowed us to have a different outlook on the end of the world. In conclusion what we will aim to work towards next time is our timing, the sound and having assigned characters and roles so that there is no more confusion.

Most liked and disliked film...

Aloha, so first blog post. I thought I'd inform you all on my most favourite film and my most least... I would even say hated. Hope you enjoy!

Favourite Film – The Breakfast club

Favourite film at the moment is “The Breakfast Club” this being because everything about it is completely relatable, for me. The character, the plot, the whole concept of the film is something I was completely drawn too. Not only this, but the songs used throughout the film gave it that slight edge which made it so memorable. For example their featured song “Don’t you (forget about me)” by The Simple Minds completely summed up the film. The lyrics were basically the whole conclusion to the film and yet left me wanting more. The thing that I adore most about this film is the casting and the chosen characters for each. The cast consists of seven unique people. John, Claire, Brian, Allison, Andrew, Richard and Carl each character hold contrasting personalities which gives the audience the option to select one in which they can relate too. It was quite a basic film in terms of the angles and editing done, but because the plot is so home hitting it flows very well. It doesn’t require anything unnecessary because the plot of it made complete sense and was easy to follow therefore no confusion is created whilst watching nor is anyone lost.

"Show Dick, some respect"

Disliked Film – Birdemic 

Most disliked film is ‘Birdemic’ I promise you the whole film is an absolute joke. Those are ninety minutes of my life that I will never get back. It’s a film with a messy plot. The actors cannot act to save their lives. The sound and editing is just unbearable, and the special effects just make me question the fact that where they even trying? The trailer for the film makes you assume that the film is a parody, which at first I thought it was… However this was not the case. The one thing that really makes me completely despise this film is their use of birds. Like really? Could you have not used a more vicious animal? I don’t know a dog? Tarantula… the most terrifying thing about a bird is the fear that they may poop on you whilst you’re walking around. It’s a complete mystery to me. I honestly cannot express the hatred I have for this film collectively. The fact that there is a sequel just makes my blood boil. It should be banned, and after each view ‘neuralyzer’ should be used upon us all. So that we can forget the horridness that is ‘Birdemic’

*points at you all, yeah! YOU, YOU, AND YOU YEAH!* 

SO MUCH EMPHASIS.

For those of you who are unaware of what a 'Neuralyzer' is.

Hope you enjoyed my little rant/ admiration post. A bit of both, oh yes.